Doctors Refusing to Participate in Obamacare


Exchange Plans a Bad Deal for Doctors

October 30, 2014
A number of doctors are choosing not to participate in Obamacare exchange health plans in the upcoming year. According to the medical practice trade group Medical Group Management Association, 214,524 physicians will not be participating in any Affordable Care Act Exchange.
Why are doctors unwilling to participate? According to Brittany La Couture of the American Action Forum, many doctors are worried that patients may stop paying premiums, which is problematic for providers:
  • According to HHS regulations, individuals who stop paying their premiums are granted a 90-day grace period (unlike in the private insurance market, where an individual would lose his coverage altogether in the event of nonpayment).
  • Insurers must continue coverage for the first 30 days of that period.
  • For the next 60 days, insurers will cover any services that are provided to nonpaying patients only if the patient actually pays his overdue premium by the end of the three-month grace period.
  • If he does not, the health care provider is stuck with the losses and must try to recover payment from the patient directly. (Blogger's Comment: Who thought this was a good idea? Can we get a name, title and picture so we can ask what the thought process was? I'll bet Admin wanted 90 days and insurance companies pushed back and settled for 30 and since AMA was bought off and not representing the providers interests, this is the result. And like most things in the ACA no one considered the law of unintended consequences.)
La Couture writes that this is the main reason doctors are not participating in the exchange plans. Data indicates that 1 million Americans enrolled in exchange plans but did not pay their premiums. If those individuals obtained care during the grace period, their doctors may go uncompensated.
Additionally, the exchanges have narrow networks and low reimbursement rates which are unattractive to doctors:
  • To make their health plans cheap and thus attractive to potential enrollees, insurance companies created narrow networks which featured relatively few health care providers per insurance plan. Insurers offered doctors low reimbursement rates, with the idea that health care providers could make up the difference due to the high patient volume that would come from the narrow networks.
  • However, the reimbursement rates are so low -- and doctors are already burdened with patients -- that the increased patient volume does nothing to make it more profitable. Insurers are offering incredibly low reimbursement rates; what the private sector would pay $1.00 for, Medicare pays $0.80 for and exchange plans pay around $0.60 for. (This is the first I have seen the claim that the exchanges will only pay 60%. Is this number correct? Is it part of the ACA? Did HHS regulate it? Market forces? Other?)
  • Many doctors are worried that those on exchange plans are sicker than the average patient, because many on exchange plans were uninsured prior to the Affordable Care Act.                                     
According to La Couture, 70 percent of California doctors were not participating in the state's exchange in January 2014.
Source: Brittany La Couture, "Health Care Providers are Opting-Out of Obamacare Exchange Plans," American Action Forum, October 27, 2014.
Sourced from NCPA.ORG


Social Security Finances Fixed – Forever


Pre-funding at birth: A Senior Entitlement Reform Plan that will work for all Americans:

Imagine that after months of intense debate the following article appeared in the New York Times.

Social Security Finances Fixed – Forever 

Washington DC 9/1/2016: Today, President Smart signed the American Birth Contribution Act into law. The ABC law, as it is commonly called, mandates that the Social Security Administration shall deposit $1000 into a new ABC-Social Security account for every US citizen born after midnight January 1, 2017. By investing in a total market equity index, the ABC fund is predicted to mirror the historic US average annual rate of return of 10.4%. At that growth rate, a beneficiary can expect her account value to double nine times by age 63 and ten times by age 70. A ten fold doubling would place the account balance at over $1 million and would be sufficient to pay 30% more in inflation adjusted benefits for the life of the beneficiary.

Furthermore, the law guarantees through the full faith and credit of the United States that benefit purchasing power will be at least equal to the average purchasing power of Social Security benefits forecasted under current law. The guarantee helps ensure that ABC beneficiaries will no longer have to fear the security of their Social Security benefits because of political gamesmanship, economic slowdowns, stock market fluctuations, changes in inflation computations, underfunding of accounts or government shutdowns. 

The ABC plan not only protects Social Security for the next and all subsequent generations but goes a long way to resolving the current Social Security system’s financial shortfall. As ABC beneficiaries die over time, the ABC Plan will amass sizable surpluses. These surpluses will be used to sure up today’s Social Security shortages and are projected to eventually eliminate the $20 plus trillion in Social Security’s unfunded liability. 

The annual cost to fund the ABC plan for the expected 4 million US citizens born each year is approximately $4 billion and shall be funded by reducing the amount Congress may borrow each year from the Social Security surplus fund. 

During the signing ceremony President Smart said that the ABC-Social Security law was the keystone of her platform’s Win-Win solutions for America. She added that she was looking forward to Congress sending her the ABC-Medicare bill next month so that she could sign that bill into law and that this government could finally start eliminating our nation’s $60 trillion in unfunded liabilities. 

You can learn more about the American Birth Contribution plans at